Thanks, JC.
If I recall correctly, it was f/2.8 -- and according the the EXIF, the
shutter speed was 1/1000.
-- Walt
On 8/28/2012 10:30 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
nice shot. I notice the far distance is out of the DOF. you must have
used a nearly wide open fstop and a very fast shutter speed?
-----------------
J.C.O'Connell
[email protected]
-----------------
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Walt
Gilbert
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:57 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Nifty Fifty comparison over at the forums RE: I dont need
nostinkin' AF
I shot this with my M 50/2.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/7111327281/
Granted, I have a pauper's kit, but I vastly prefer the old glass to any
of the newer stuff I've got.
-- Walt
On 8/28/2012 9:42 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
An older high quality lens, manually focussed properly, will beat an el
cheapo new AF lens every time. Just because a lens is new doesnt make it
good or better than any old lens. And yes there
were some stinky old lenses too but there are/were some really good Pentax
K, M, and A lenses now pushing 30-40 years old that "work" fine on brand
new
DSLRS. As long as you can focus them, which I can at least. High speed
sports or street photography? Not so much, but general purpose, yes.
The A series lenses for example offer full aperture control, just MF, no
AF
and that series is already roughly 20-30 years old now, but not obsolete
by
any measure. Thats whats great about Pentax DSLR System.
I have tried many AF lenses and dont like working that way. Give me a
silky
smooth manual focus K, M, A series lens with high optical quality and Im
happy. For static or slow speed subjects, I rarely miss on focus, much
less
than using AF misses. I pass on AF for my stuff, just as I pass on AE. And
yeah, I know you can manually focus most AF lenses, but the MF "feel" of
AF
lenses is usually garbage by design.
-----------------
J.C.O'Connell
[email protected]
-----------------
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
John
Celio
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Nifty Fifty comparison over at the forums
I've spent enough time futzing around with old lenses to know that
modern glass does everything I need and does it faster and a lot more
conveniently. You guys can go on using your "vintage" equipment, I'm
not telling you to stop, just quit acting like every lens comparison
needs to include stuff from fifty years ago. That was technology then,
this is technology now. I've gotten rid of all but three of my
pre-digital lenses because modern lenses just work better on dSLRs,
hands down.
John
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
