This fellow seems to be pretty high on the K-5 2s. Even comes up with a why-not-Nikon whine. Paul On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sep 11, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Joseph McAllister <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sep 10, 2012, at 20:03 , John Francis wrote: >> >>>> Agreed. These new cameras aren't going to tempt many people to upgrade >>>> from a K-5. They're probably not intended to. >>> >>> The diiferences I spot on the K-5 II are: >>> >>> o Better auto-focus (this is the big one from where I'm sitting) >> >> But they never say how much better. If it isn't an "Industry Breakthrough" >> it is probably about the same as the K-10 to K-7 "improvement". Just a >> little bit. >> > > Ir'a hard to quantify improvements in autofocus, but the K-5 is definitely > deficient in that regard, so I expect a substantial improvement. Hope I'm > right. > Paul > > >>> >>> o Improved rear LCD (brighter & sharper, but same size & resolution) >> >> Retina Display? >>> >>> o SDXC memory card compatibility (or was that added in a K5 firware >>> upgrade?) >>> >> Don't remember. Don't have any of the XC cards, nor do I need them. Yet. >>> >>> Everything else looks to be the same as the K-5. Am I forgetting anything? >> >> Nothing that hasn't already been moved back behind the green curtain. (OZ) >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
