In what way is the K-5 deficient in auto-focus?
takes too long to get there, or doesnt get it right?
cf the ist-d ?
ann
On 9/11/2012 20:25, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Joseph McAllister <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sep 10, 2012, at 20:03 , John Francis wrote:
Agreed. These new cameras aren't going to tempt many people to upgrade
from a K-5. They're probably not intended to.
The diiferences I spot on the K-5 II are:
o Better auto-focus (this is the big one from where I'm sitting)
But they never say how much better. If it isn't an "Industry Breakthrough" it is probably
about the same as the K-10 to K-7 "improvement". Just a little bit.
Ir'a hard to quantify improvements in autofocus, but the K-5 is definitely
deficient in that regard, so I expect a substantial improvement. Hope I'm right.
Paul
o Improved rear LCD (brighter & sharper, but same size & resolution)
Retina Display?
o SDXC memory card compatibility (or was that added in a K5 firware upgrade?)
Don't remember. Don't have any of the XC cards, nor do I need them. Yet.
Everything else looks to be the same as the K-5. Am I forgetting anything?
Nothing that hasn't already been moved back behind the green curtain. (OZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
