> From: Joseph McAllister <pentax...@mac.com> > But the monthly charges entailed in having a phone embedded in the camera > would be an ongoing expense of several hundred dollars a month. Plus you > would have to design a DSLR that wouldn't look ridiculous holding up to your > ear. PLUS to just have cell phone, you'd have to carry your PENTANICANON with > you all the time. (Not a bad thing, but burdensome) > > Got the picture?
But WHAT IF, the camera phone was shaped like a shoe with a rotary dial??? That would be smart! get it? Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
