On 9/12/2012 8:29 PM, Tom C wrote:
From: Joseph McAllister <pentax...@mac.com>
But the monthly charges entailed in having a phone embedded in the camera would
be an ongoing expense of several hundred dollars a month. Plus you would have
to design a DSLR that wouldn't look ridiculous holding up to your ear. PLUS to
just have cell phone, you'd have to carry your PENTANICANON with you all the
time. (Not a bad thing, but burdensome)
Got the picture?
But WHAT IF, the camera phone was shaped like a shoe with a rotary
dial??? That would be smart! get it?
Tom C.
So you'd be the first to get [the] smart phone?
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
