I sure as hell can't see any glaring advantage to the K-5 IIs, nor do I see any significant issue in red saturated areas of the test image. However what remains impressive is how little image quality degradation there is switching from ISO80 to ISO 800 ;)
On 10 November 2012 14:53, Tim Bray <[email protected]> wrote: > DPR has samples so you can do close-in comparison... here are the K-5, > the K-5 II, and K-5 IIs doing ISO6400 RAW. > > The IIs may have big advantages, but they're sure not on display here. > Zero in on anything that has intense red saturation; I was surprised > by what I saw. > > Having said that, I totally disapprove of pixel-peeping. Anyhow, > that's my story and I’m sticking to it. -T > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
