The resolution advantage is there in plain view. Focus on any fine text. Eg: examine the red square area below the globe, with the poem. Try it at ISO 100 first then switch back to 6400. The K-5IIs degrades the least of al the samples.
I added the Canon 5DMkII in to the samples and was interested to note that the K-5IIs actually beats it for fine rez, and looks cleaner at 6400 ISO. On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Rob Studdert <[email protected]> wrote: > I sure as hell can't see any glaring advantage to the K-5 IIs, nor do > I see any significant issue in red saturated areas of the test image. > However what remains impressive is how little image quality > degradation there is switching from ISO80 to ISO 800 ;) > > > > On 10 November 2012 14:53, Tim Bray <[email protected]> wrote: >> DPR has samples so you can do close-in comparison... here are the K-5, >> the K-5 II, and K-5 IIs doing ISO6400 RAW. >> >> The IIs may have big advantages, but they're sure not on display here. >> Zero in on anything that has intense red saturation; I was surprised >> by what I saw. >> >> Having said that, I totally disapprove of pixel-peeping. Anyhow, >> that's my story and I’m sticking to it. -T >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) > Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours > Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
