How much of a difference is there (in performance) between the WR version and the standard version of the D FA 100mm macro?
Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Boris Liberman <[email protected]> wrote: > It is so frustratingly silly. Found the original message... > > It "suddenly" occurred to me, Dan, that you may have a good and solid excuse > to buy into DFA 100/2.8 Macro WR lens and get yourself a proper outdoor > macro kit in terms of WR. > > Though it is not cheap. > > But again, my vote would be for D-FA 50/2.8 macro - seems like it has many > things from many worlds (aperture ring, FF coverage - can be used on film, > very good image quality both in non-macro range, etc)... > > > On 12/1/2012 4:18 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >> >> I want a versatile macro lens for my K-r, that would be suitable when >> eventually I upgrade to a K-5 series or whatever comes along. Without >> getting too exotic or pricey, I would like fairly wide max aperture >> and good bokeh. I would use it mostly to shoot flowers, butterflies >> and the like. If it could take decent images outside the macro range >> as well, that would be a plus. >> >> What are others using? What moderately price lens would you recommend> >> >> TIA, Dan >> >> Dan Matyola >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
