> Joseph McAllister wrote:
>
>>
>>On Feb 1, 2013, at 13:32 , Charles Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2013, at 15:07 , Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm getting 18 or 19 mb files in DNG's.
>>>> Once you can't recover some bad shots,
>>>> you'll stop using JPG's.
>>>> It costs almost nothing and gives better results!
>>>
>>> Interesting.. mine are all 20-29Mb.
>>
>>Put more sky into your compositions. That'll get rid of 8-10 Mb!
>
> Yep, the K-5 writes *compressed* DNG format. Compression yields
> smaller files with less detailed subjects. Higher ISO settings yield
> more noise and thus larger files, too.

I needed to shoot DNG for an event and found something annoying.

I normally add a digit to the file index using the fourth character of the
name, so 7043 becomes LRC37043.PEF, but if I shoot in DNG I lose the
fourth character, it becomes _LRC7043.DNG.



-- 
[email protected] via squirrelmail


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to