I disagree, too.

But what really frosts me about the statement is the implicit
arrogance that assumes anyone who generally prefers colour to
B&W images is just plain wrong, and an inferior being incapable
of appreciating the true value of the work.

If you like B&W images, fine. But it should be possible for
you to enjoy them without disparaging those who don't.



On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:54:45PM -0400, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Two words: Afghan Girl.
> 
> IOW, I disagree. :-)
> 
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ansel's color images are nice enough but they illustrate, in a way
> > that few other things can, how color images can never have the
> > gravitas of a good B&W image.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Zos Xavius <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1932762,00.html
> >>
> >> worth a look!
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:41 AM, George Sinos <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> A few years ago there was an exhibit of various photographers work at
> >>> the local museum.  Several 8x10 color transparencies were on display
> >>> (Kodachrome, if I remember correctly.)  They were on a large light
> >>> table, back lit, of course.
> >>>
> >>>  I was surprised to see that were Adam's work.  gs
> >>> George Sinos
> >>> --------------------
> >>> www.GeorgesPhotos.net
> >>> www.GeorgeSinos.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:37 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> I had the same thought. But since he preferred  B&W, he probably would 
> >>>> have
> >>>> found the first digital cameras disappointing  for B&W. Although he did
> >>>> shoot some in color too.
> >>>>
> >>>> Marnie aka  Doe    I really got a lot ouf of the interview.
> >>>>
> >>>> In a  message dated 4/15/2013 4:38:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> >>>> [email protected] writes:
> >>>> He could see the potential in digital image  capture even at that early
> >>>> stage, one wonders what amazing work he could have  produced with the
> >>>> new medium.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Rob Studdert (Digital  Image  Studio)
> >>>> Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
> >>>> Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter,  Facebook, Picasa: distudio
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> >>>> follow the directions.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> >>> follow the directions.
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> >> follow the directions.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" -
> > Peter Galassi
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> > follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -bmw
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to