Yeah, but not well. And with radio triggers being as little as ten bucks a unit, there's no reason to torture yourself with flaky line-of-sight optical stuff. I've done it both ways; radio triggers win hands-down.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:51 PM, John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote: > I think he had something like this in mind. > > http://www.amazon.com/Seagull-SYK-4-Optical-Trigger-Socket/sim/B0028DM1YA/2 > > They'd work. > > From: Bruce Walker >> >> Sorry, Walt, these are strictly useful now as fully manual. They >> support TTL, but your cameras don't. And they don't have any slave >> functions at all. >> >> To use these wirelessly you need to get some cheap wireless triggers, >> like the Cowboy Studios NPT-04's ($20 for Tx/Rx). >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Walt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks, Bruce. >>> >>> Do you suppose they'd be good as slaves when used with optical triggers? > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
