Sure there's a perfect camera. It's just no one is manufacturing it yet.
On 7/16/2013 7:04 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:26:57PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
Well, no, Tom, the situations aren't at all parallel.
I'm very, very happy to be using MRIs and PET/CTs. I'm also very happy to be
using a K-5 instead of an istD or Super Program.
The technology has its place, though. I don't get an MRI on every patient with
a tummyache, just because it's available. I don't need a 24MP FF camera to do
the kind of photography I do.
Are you promoting the heretical view that not every photographer needs
the ultimate performance in every category, for every photo that they
take? Jeez, next thing you'll be saying is that one size does not
fit all, and even worse, that there is no such thing as a perfect
camera, because the things that would make it better for one application
could make it worse for another application.
I do hope however, that once pixel spacing gets below about 450nm
the race for higher resolution will taper off.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
