I managed quite well for a long time with the 4/28-70 Pentax on the camera and 2.8/20 mm Pentax (also expensive) in the pocket. Now when I have the 24-90 I use the 20 mm very seldom. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 01. huhtikuuta 2002 1:31 Aihe: RE: FA 28-105 or FA 28-70 ? >> I find it to be a good idea to make a FAQ for the PDML. >> But a lot of work to build it up. > >I AGREE! Thats why I said "we'll see" :o) I like "projects" like that so >it would be fun (and informative!) for me, but I have enough (too many) >photography related distractions from my _real_ work as it is, I suppose. ><sigh> > >> I think I will go for the FA 28-70 f/4 AL. > <snip>With that said, >perhaps the 28-70 + a wide prime [20 or 24mm] combo would be a better >purchase. [still debating that part]. Just thinkin aloud. > >Anyhow, Best of luck with your purchase. > jerome - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
