Try it - then you�ll find out. And that�s what all the tests are saying, too. And I am not against Sigma in general - I have had the 70-300 APO for a long time and like it and now I have the 2.8/105 macro - and I did have the original 3.5-4.2/21-35 mm two-touch. All very good lenses, but then I bought the 2.8-4/28-105... All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: T Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 01. huhtikuuta 2002 4:06 Aihe: Re: FA 28-105 or FA 28-70 ? >Golly, I have to try one of these lenses. I can not without first hand >experience believe they are that bad. Even my 35-70 super cheap Sigma is >pretty good, not robust, but the image is OK. Of course people who complain >of distortion on zoom lenses live in a different universe than I do, one >with different laws of physics. Anyway, I can not believe the 28-105 2.8/4.0 >Sigma can be that bad considering its price point. > >Ciao, >Graywolf >http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
