You forgot the 4.0/28-85 Tokina, the oldest version, that is - it has tested very well. If anybody has one surplus to requirements, I�d like to buy it. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 01. huhtikuuta 2002 16:34 Aihe: Re: FA 28-105 or FA 28-70 ? >If autofocus is neither needed nor desired, there are several well-built third-party >choices from the good ol' days; some are PKAs: > >Vivitar 24-70 (f/3.8?) >Kiron 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 >Vivitar 28-90 (f/2.8-3.5) >Rikenon 28-100 f/4 >Vivitar Series 1 28-105/2.8-3.8 >Kiron 28-105 (f/3.5-4.5?) >Rikenon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 >Vivitar 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 > >Most have a modest macro capability, although sometimes at the short end. Some >reportedly have problems with vignetting, pincushioning, or flare, but that could be >said of most zooms in this range. > >I have collected comments on most of these. If anyone has experience with one of the >Ricoh's, I'd be interested. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
