Oh I see. Reading a bit on this there appears to be little quality
difference in pictures between the two optical formulas and that the 8
element is rare, and obviously more valuable. Pretty much as much as I
assumed. I guess if hybrids existed they would be rare yet and worth a
bit more.

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Zos Xavius <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm going to be the dumb guy here and ask is there any real major
> differences between the 7 and 8 element version optically? IIRC the
> earlier version is more desirable? Or do I have it the wrong way
> around? I never got what the big deal was over the Takumar 50/1.4. I
> have a M50/1.4 and its very, very good for portraits with delicious
> smooth bokeh. From some sources, I heard the takumar is slightly
> softer. So what's the deal with this lens?
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That's true, J.C. but that is the part you are least likely to see
>> when looking at photos (online auctions, etc.)
>> The lens will either be on the camera or they will have a cap on the
>> back. Unless the seller knows what they actually have, in which case
>> somebody else can buy it.
>> : )
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:25 PM, J.C. O'Connell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> FWIW,
>>>
>>> The easiest way to tell a true 8 element is the rear glass element
>>> protrudes unprotected.  On the later 7 element versions the rear
>>> element glass has a metal rim protecting it.
>>> jco
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/13/2013 2:48 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Don't know how many will be interested in this, but it is kind of a
>>>> big deal if you are looking for the original 8 element Super Takumar
>>>> 50mm f1.4 (or think you already own one).
>>>>
>>>> It started when I found this photo on Flickr: 3 versions of Super
>>>> Takumar f1.4/50mm ?!
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/8312126654
>>>>
>>>> The poster here believes that the middle lens is a hybrid between the
>>>> 8 element and the 7 element. He goes on to dissect it and prove that
>>>> it is a 7 element design. But I discovered taht one thing that threw
>>>> him off is actually a Pentax mistake: If you look at the Red Infrared
>>>> focusing mark and compare the three lenses, you will see that the
>>>> spacing of the lines is different on the true 8 element, as compared
>>>> to the other two. The "hybrid" actually has the wrong line painted
>>>> red. This gives the impression that it is an 8 element, but if you
>>>> look closely you will see that they have actually painted the f4 line
>>>> red on the "hybrid".
>>>>
>>>> I don't know how many example of this there might be out there, but if
>>>> you were counting on the red infrared focusing mark as the identifying
>>>> feature you might want to look again. I placed a comment in that
>>>> photo's thread showing the same thing.
>>>>
>>>> So the "hybrid" IS a transitional lens, in that they are still using
>>>> the A/M designation (like they did on the original 8 element) and not
>>>> the later Auto/Man. But it is in all other respects a 7 element lens.
>>>>
>>>> To help narrow it down a bit, in a later post, Andreas gives the
>>>> serial numbers of the two lenses:
>>>> 1585445 the 8 element
>>>> 1591478 the "hybrid"
>>>>
>>>> Side note:
>>>> The majority of people who are registering the serial number of their
>>>> original 8 element Super Takumar 50mm f1.4s are on crack (or believe
>>>> they have one since they procurred it from an unscrupulous seller that
>>>> listed it as such)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-serial-number-database/?do=viewserials&id=127
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> J.C. O'Connell
>>> [email protected]
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" -
>> Peter Galassi
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to