I dunno. With the K-3, its going to take a substantial FF camera to provide much improvement. Unless it offers significant resolution increase or much higher ISO capability (these two usually do not go together) then for me a 24mp full frame is kind of boring. I considered a cheap 5dmk2 for a while. If anything to get easier access to wide angles and then I could just my pentax cameras for reach. But the K-5 gives better files with more DR and less shadow noise and banding, resolution aside. If the K-3 is on par at least with the D7100, with good glass you should get results very comparable to 5dmk3 and D600 pictures, though with a stop more DOF. Lenses are the real limiting factor. On aps-c moreso as diffraction limits start taking their toll earlier. I'd love to build a collection of limiteds over time, and that means I will be with aps-c for a while asides from the few ltds and full frame lenses I already have. Though I have to admit a proper k-mount FF would be TON of fun with legacy glass. Especially a mirrorless with good focus peaking...
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:30 AM, David J Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well for me, after reading the post, if a FF camera is planned for >> 2014, why would i buy a K-3, just wait it out for the FF. My K-5 is >> working fine and would be a great back up camera. Me thinks this is >> bunk my self. >> >> Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
