The source for K-5 raw smoothing? The source for resized K3 files? What source do you speak of Mr Boris? :P
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Boris Liberman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/26/2013 6:38 AM, Zos Xavius wrote: >> >> Also I must add that the k-5 does some definite noise reduction to the >> raw files over iso 1600, whether that's in the imaging pipeline or the >> firmware is neither hear nor there at this point. At 3200 on the k-5 >> you are most certainly trading resolution for image quality. I don't >> have any real figures, but I feel that looking at the files from my >> k-5, its easily giving up quite a bit of resolution due to noise >> smoothing. From what I can gather the K-3 is resolving more fine >> detail but yet showing similar amounts of noise when resized to k-5 >> resolution. That's what I have seen with my own eyes at least. To be >> honest they are pretty close and careful raw processing will result >> with more detail in the k-3 files with similar noise levels. I find >> pentax's jpeg engine to be not the greatest at noise reduction, but >> honestly, its better than some other camera makers too. > > > Zos, can you please point me to the source of that information? I'm > extremely interested to *know*. > > Thanks. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
