The female breast is not a sexual object. It's merely a producer of infant food. Nothing more.
Do you really believe that, Bill? Cheers, frank Bill <[email protected]> wrote: >On 09/12/2013 9:35 PM, knarf wrote: >> I know I said I was done with this thread. Apparently I lied. ;-) >> >> But I had to jump in to completely disagree with your assertion wrt >the underlying premise. >> >> To my mind the premise is that there is a huge disparity in the way >that women and men are portrayed in the media including the arts. Women >tend to be sexualized far more than men and often in denigrating and >offensive ways. That includes but doesn't have to mean nudity. >> >> People can point to exceptions but that doesn't change the fact that >women are sexualized far more often and in different ways than men. >> >> This doesn't mean that sex is dirty or wrong or that it doesn't make >the world go 'round. >> >> A bit of balance would be nice, that's all... >> > >Yes well, when men start creating FOOD by biological process within >their bodies, you might be on to something. > >bill “Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
