Well, Ken you're one of those who is inhibited by integrity.;-)
Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Waller <[email protected]> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 10:23 AM Subject: Re: Another PJ in trouble for Photoshopping >An unaltered photograph can do just as much misleading as an altered one > can. That's one of the reasons in my experience that the other side would generally send another expert to do a similar inspection/photography as I did. In several instances, their experts omitted photographs that were detrimental to their case. I always kept my negatives uncut to show that roll by roll, what I had printed was what I had captured and not omit images. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Another PJ in trouble for Photoshopping > John wrote: > >> Photojournalism is not about THE TRUTH, it's about accurately >> representing what is in front of the camera. The viewer can find their >> own truth. > > In that case I find the underlying principles to be deeply flawed. An > unaltered photograph can do just as much misleading as an altered one > can. > > Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
