You make that sound like it's something bad.
On 1/24/2014 1:43 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Well, Ken you're one of those who is inhibited by integrity.;-)
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Waller <[email protected]>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: Another PJ in trouble for Photoshopping
An unaltered photograph can do just as much misleading as an altered one
can.
That's one of the reasons in my experience that the other side would
generally send another expert to do a similar inspection/photography as I
did.
In several instances, their experts omitted photographs that were
detrimental to their case. I always kept my negatives uncut to show that
roll by roll, what I had printed was what I had captured and not omit
images.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom C" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Another PJ in trouble for Photoshopping
John wrote:
Photojournalism is not about THE TRUTH, it's about accurately
representing what is in front of the camera. The viewer can find their
own truth.
In that case I find the underlying principles to be deeply flawed. An
unaltered photograph can do just as much misleading as an altered one
can.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
