Rob Studdert <[email protected]> wrote: > I have the Sigma 10-20/3.5 lens, it's pretty damned good, ... > That all said it's > neither particularly light or small so maybe not great for travel > unless you really need the versatility that the zoom affords.
Yes, and neither that lens nor the Pentax 12-24 is cheap either. I wrote in the original post: >>> The Pentax 21 f3.2 limited looks good but may not be wide enough. After some experimentation with the 16-45 set for 20mm or so, I now think my best choice is the 21mm Limited. Versatility is good, but the 21 is much smaller and lighter and a bit cheaper as well. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
