> On Dec 5, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > Malcolm Smith wrote: > >> Photoshop or Lightroom? Lightroom or Photoshop? Or both? Or neither? > > Each one will do things the other won't, but Lightroom is by far the > better tool for photographers these days; Photoshop has become more of > a graphic designer's tool. That's not to say you can't have a good > workflow with Photoshop and Bridge, but if you find yourself regularly > needing the features of Photoshop that Lightroom can't do there are > probably shortcomings in your photographic technique that need > addressing more than software. If you're going to have one tool for > photography Lightroom is the best choice. If you can afford both then > get both :)
Indeed... I have both (PS CS v5.1 and current LR) and didn't bother upgrading to latest PS because I hardly use it. Once in a while it's necessary, usually for type manipulation on layouts, and the older version I have works fine for that and the occasional panorama stitch. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
