That must be a new version of it. The original was a big beige boat and 
succeeded the R 1200.

Paul via phone

> On Apr 18, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Paul Sorenson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> No.  You're wrong. The R2000 is still in production. 
> 
> http://t.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Product.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&sku=C11CB35201
> 
> -p
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Apr 18, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Do you mean the R 3000? The 2000 has been out of production for at least ten 
>> years.
>> 
>> Paul via phone
>> 
>>> On Apr 18, 2015, at 2:30 AM, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ann -
>>> 
>>> I would agree with Mark C re:  to get the exact output you want you can 
>>> best do it by printing your own images.  Not only do you have more control 
>>> over the process, you have a wider range of paper surfaces from which to 
>>> choose.  Plus...it's most impressive when you can report that the print was 
>>> created by the photographer and not sent out for a lab to do the printing.  
>>> And, of course, you never call them "inkjet" prints, you call them "Giclée" 
>>>  <vbg>
>>> 
>>> I have been using an Epson R2000 for the past several years and the 
>>> resulting prints are great.  Unlike some of the other Epson photo printers, 
>>> the R2000 has both matte black and photo black in its ink lineup so you 
>>> don't need to swap black inks when going from a matte paper to luster or 
>>> glossy, thus not having to waste ink purging the ink system.  The R2000 
>>> will make prints from 4x6 to 13x38.
>>> 
>>> Red River Paper has done some tests to determine the cost of ink for 
>>> several different printers and sizes of paper.  See it here:
>>> 
>>> http://www.redrivercatalog.com/cost-of-inkjet-printing.html
>>> 
>>> They also have some longevity info on pigment vs dye ink here...
>>> 
>>> http://www.redrivercatalog.com/infocenter/articles/dyerorpigmentink.htm
>>> 
>>> IMO pigment is the only way to go if you want prints that will last.
>>> 
>>> -p
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 4/17/2015 9:05 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>>>> I don't think I can do this too soon, but I wish I had a way to make my
>>>> own 11 x 17 or 12 x 18 prints
>>>> 
>>>> reviews? suggestions?
>>>> 
>>>> ann
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to