Well, when isn’t cost a consideration? I’ll put it this way: I’d like to have a 20-40/2.8-4 limited but that’s beyond my means. A 16-45/4 is much more affordable and I might go up to double KEH’s price for it if there was something that might be better for me, e.g., something as wide as the 16-45 but with a longer zoom range.
It seems that my photography requires either that or a telephoto and not much in between. So I’m not especially interested in trying to accommodate all that in one lens. I just want a good wide-angle zoom. So, should it be the 16-45 or is there something else I should consider. Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA [email protected] "Our world is a human world." - Hilary Putnam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
