Maybe a DA17-70? I can comfortably recommend the DA16-45f/4. J Sent from my iPhone
> On May 12, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, when isn’t cost a consideration? I’ll put it this way: I’d like to have > a 20-40/2.8-4 limited but that’s beyond my means. A 16-45/4 is much more > affordable and I might go up to double KEH’s price for it if there was > something that might be better for me, e.g., something as wide as the 16-45 > but with a longer zoom range. > > It seems that my photography requires either that or a telephoto and not much > in between. So I’m not especially interested in trying to accommodate all > that in one lens. I just want a good wide-angle zoom. > > So, should it be the 16-45 or is there something else I should consider. > > Thanks, > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Eric Weir > Decatur, GA USA > [email protected] > > "Our world is a human world." > > - Hilary Putnam > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
