Very interesting, and affordable. Even new. I take it from the images I’ve 
seen, ultrawide is not yet fisheye. I like the fact that the Sigma 16-50 that 
Belunt suggested has an internal focusing motor.
 
> On May 12, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I should add that if there is any way that you can "swing it" THE
> ultrawide lens to get (IMHO) is the Sigma EX 10-20mm f4-5.6. It is
> responsible for almost all of my favorite images. I got mine used for
> $350 from a Craigslist seller and it is a good one. B&H has it NEW
> right now for little more than that:
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/413425-REG/Sigma_201109_10_20mm_f_4_5_6_EX_DC.html
> One sold on Pentax Forums marketplace a month ago for $250 australian
> (which is $199 USD... makes paying the extra shipping worthwhile!)
> 
> If you want to see samples of what it can do:
> https://www.flickr.com/groups/sigma10-20/pool/
> or
> http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/122-lens-clubs/84539-sigma-10-20mm-club.html
> 
> If something happened to mine I would be suicidal. :)
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks, Matthew. That’s very helpful.
>> 
>>> On May 12, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Matthew Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> So, should it be the 16-45 or is there something else I should consider.
>>> 
>>> I had a used copy of the 16-45, and I found it to be a very good
>>> value, and I liked the 16mm wide end. But before too long, my copy
>>> became decentered, so the right edge of the image was very soft. I
>>> recently met up with PDMLer Zos Xavius, and he said that he had two
>>> copies of the lens that developed similar issues. So I'm not a fan of
>>> the build quality of the lens.
>>> 
>>> I just replaced it with a new Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 Contemporary,
>>> which is on sale for $399. So far I like the new lens; it's a bit soft
>>> at the edges at 17mm (worse than my Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 at 17mm),
>>> but respectably close to my FA 50mm f/1.4 at 50mm, and sharper than my
>>> Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 at 70mm. The reach out to 70mm is nice.
>>> 
>>> There is one thing to know about the Sigma, though: It had a firmware
>>> bug that mis-reported the focal length to the camera at the wide end,
>>> causing the shake reduction system to operate incorrectly. This bug
>>> has been fixed, but you might get a lens with the old firmware, and
>>> you would have to either send it to Sigma or buy the Sigma USB dock
>>> ($60) to update the firmware. (I just sent my copy to Sigma yesterday.
>>> I was going to buy the USB dock, but the pop-up flash button fell off
>>> my K-5 II, so I decided to send the camera to Pentax and the lens to
>>> Sigma at the same time.)
>>> 
>>> http://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/pentax-related-news/sigma-addresses-17-70mm-shake-reduction-issue.html
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Eric Weir
>> Decatur, GA  USA
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> "Our world is a human world."
>> 
>> - Hilary Putnam
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
[email protected]

"What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?" 

- Mary Oliver 









-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to