But it makes it more expensive for the users, especially those who only need LR (and not PS).
Igor George Sinos Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:34:34 -0700 wrote: I'm not sure why the subscription model wouldn't be better for them. They have a predictable continuous cash flow and an ongoing relationship with their customer. With the stand alone product, they get a bigger chunk of cash all at once, but they may never see the customer again. A lot harder to run a company when you get a big chunk of money every once in a while. Bruce Walker Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:33:53 -0700 wrote: A great deal better for them. It's a guaranteed continuous revenue stream. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Igor PDML-StR <[email protected]> wrote:
George, except that the new features are NOT available for the standlone (aka 6.x) version:
https://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2015/06/june-updates-to-cc-photography.html
Clearly, Adobe pushes people to CC. It looks like subscription-based
revenue
stream is better for them. Igor George Sinos Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:15:22 -0700 wrote: Nice upgrade to Lightroom this morning. The new De-Haze filter is getting all the headlines, but I think the most useful thing, for me anyway, is the addition of the whites and blacks sliders to the local adjustment brush. The upgrade process via the Adobe CC app was particularly nice. CC popped up the notification of the availability of the upgrade. There was a nice "what's new" link that described the new features in both Lightroom and Photoshop. After the upgrade it displayed a link to tutorials. Much better than in the past. Lots of new features for Lightroom mobile, but I'm fairly stationary and don't edit on the iPad that much. Overall, very nice. gs George Sinos
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
