Yeah, hell, what are results compared to all of those other factors? Len ---
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:26 PM Subject: Re: Wide angle lenses > Think about the size and the weight. Think about how either the > FA24/2.0 and the K24/2.8 may feel when focusing. Think about the kind > of images you like and would like to produce. Don't just buy a lens > because it's sharper, or has "better" optics or "better" coatings. Find > out what "better" means, and is it better for your needs. There are > reasons why so many people like the older lenses ... and likewise the > newer lenses. What's your reason for wanting a wider lens? Is it > coincidental with the features and characteristics of the FA24/2.0, or > the K24/2.8, or some other lens. > > TM wrote: > > > > Considering the comments on the site you linked, it sounds like > > the new 24mm f2.0 is the best out of the 24mm lenses. It's only > > a $40 difference and the new lens is, of course, brand new. > > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ > "When a man's best friend is his dog, > that dog has a problem." --Edward Abbey > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
