I agree. I tried Vuescan on a Mac and found that it offered no advantage over the Epson or Agfa software I had been using. But I do the real correction work in PhotoShop as well. I generally try to get just a somewhat low contrast baseline scan that includes all the highlight and shadow detail, then I work on it in PhotoShop, which is a much more powerful and accurate tool than any scanner software. Paul
William Wiseman wrote: > > I don't know. My results with it were lousy and it wouldn't run > correctly most of the time (MAC). I prefer to adjust in Photoshop. > SilverFast Ai is better than Vuescan but it doesn't support Minolta > scanners. I like it for my Epson 1640. > > JeffW. > > > Why is Vuescan a better choice than most other programs, and, seemingly, > > better, or more highly praised, than the factory software? > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
