I really hope you don't ask people to look at your flash gun.. this is
NOT good for eyes, especially elderly ones!
If you must use artificial light, bounce the flash, please...
Flash is hardly necessary for posed group shtos these days.. better to
up your ISO
On 1/13/2018 6:25 PM, Jos de Fotograaf wrote:
To improve the success rate with large groups I follow some advises:
* I tell them to go closer to each other. CLOSER!
* You must see my lens with both eyes, otherwise you are covered partly
* If there is a flashgun I tell them to see the flash with both eyes
otherwise there will be a shadow on your face
* While shooting, Speak to them to keep attention (jokes and/or
On 13-Jan-18 22:48, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Occasionally I am asked to take a group photo.
Every time I am choosing the best (or even usable) photo from the set,
I am struggling with finding one. The reason is that at any given
moment someone takes less then the best pose, facial expression, ...
So, you end up with one photo where it's better for one person, and
another one for another person...
So, I've been thinking about some empirical formula for the number of
photos I need to take to ensure I could choose one where everybody is
When I have 1 person, the first photo will be bad, so, I need to take
an extra (or two). So,
for 1 person: 1+1 (or 1+2) photos.
For 2 people I will have about two bad ones (one for each), so, 2+1
One might think that for N people, I'd need N+1 (or N+2)...
But that's wrong, because in addition to everybody having individual
bad moments, I will have a combination of bad poses in more then one
person, plus, people getting distracted when the crowd grows close to
10 and above.
The deduction and combinatorics does not seem to work well here, but
I suspect that statistically, I'd need N^2+1 or even N!+1 (where
N!=1*2*3*...*N) to optimize the probability of finding one photo
where everybody looks fine.
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow