Rob Studdert wrote: >The K5IIs actually made the K5 useful, I'm still using my mK5IIs, my >pair of K5 bodies are long gone, their focus speed/accuracy in low >light was appalling. If these specs are true it's really offering a >very very limited advantage over the original K1.
Well, yeah. That's the point: To offer just enough improvement to be useful but not enough to piss off people who already have a K-1 (by making them think they should have waited). >On 16 February 2018 at 11:13, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >> Uh...yes. I have the lenses and camera (k-1) I need. Want the 70-250 but >> waiting for a price break. The K-1 II is a typical between models upgrade, >> much like we saw between the K5 and K3. The next full frame camera will >> probably be a Nikon 850 clone, and Ill buy it. No problem here, >> >> Paul >> >>> On Feb 15, 2018, at 6:39 PM, Zos Xavius <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Most pointless update ever IMO. Are they taking a page from Canon now? Wtf >>> Ricoh? No k3 replacement in sight either. No new GR. A lens or two a year >>> now? Will there be any pentaxians left??? -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
