I'm reading it as practically no improvement (plus where the f is the replacement for the K3?)
On 16 February 2018 at 13:29, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob Studdert wrote: > >>The K5IIs actually made the K5 useful, I'm still using my mK5IIs, my >>pair of K5 bodies are long gone, their focus speed/accuracy in low >>light was appalling. If these specs are true it's really offering a >>very very limited advantage over the original K1. > > Well, yeah. That's the point: To offer just enough improvement to be > useful but not enough to piss off people who already have a K-1 (by > making them think they should have waited). > >>On 16 February 2018 at 11:13, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Uh...yes. I have the lenses and camera (k-1) I need. Want the 70-250 but >>> waiting for a price break. The K-1 II is a typical between models upgrade, >>> much like we saw between the K5 and K3. The next full frame camera will >>> probably be a Nikon 850 clone, and Ill buy it. No problem here, >>> >>> Paul >>> >>>> On Feb 15, 2018, at 6:39 PM, Zos Xavius <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Most pointless update ever IMO. Are they taking a page from Canon now? Wtf >>>> Ricoh? No k3 replacement in sight either. No new GR. A lens or two a year >>>> now? Will there be any pentaxians left??? > > -- > Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia > www.robertstech.com > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
