It needed an 85 right out the gate. Instead they focused on yet
another 50mm, something which Pentax is certainly not lacking in....

A flagship full frame camera and not even a single new prime to pair
it with, but hey, let's pump out another body. That's just what the
market wants! yeah!

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Pentax released several new zooms with the K-1, and I think that’s a priority 
> in today’s marketplace, particularly for a pro grade camera. On any almost 
> type of assignment where  you have to work fast you need the flexibility of a 
> zoom. Most of the the zooms, BTW, are superior to the brand’s earlier primes, 
> so it’s hard to complain. Plus, the brand still offers some good primes in 
> the Limited line. I still use my K 85/1.8 and my A 50/1.2, Two very nice 
> primes. But they’re more for play than work.
>
>
>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 2:11 PM, Zos Xavius <zosxav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> They released a FF camera and not a single prime and yet they think
>> this is a priority. Think about that for a minute. Ricoh is milking it
>> pretty fucking hard.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:57 PM, William Robb
>> <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:29 PM Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rob Studdert wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The K5IIs actually made the K5 useful, I'm still using my mK5IIs, my
>>>>> pair of K5 bodies are long gone, their focus speed/accuracy in low
>>>>> light was appalling. If these specs are true it's really offering a
>>>>> very very limited advantage over the original K1.
>>>>
>>>> Well, yeah. That's the point: To offer just enough improvement to be
>>>> useful but not enough to piss off people who already have a K-1 (by
>>>> making them think they should have waited).
>>>>
>>> It doesn’t appear to have worked out very well. People here and on that
>>> somewhat neurotic forum dedicated to Pentax are having kittens because of
>>> this “useless upgrade”.
>>> This seems to be another case of the more you have, the less happy you are.
>>>
>>> Ricoh doesn’t seem to be giving Pentax the unlimited resources required to
>>> build a world class system in a hurry, and at this point, they need to be
>>> fleshing out some sort of prime lens system more than new cameras.
>>> We’ll get out K1 replacement, but I expect it won’t happen until they can
>>> plunk a 50mp sensor into it and not have it cost $3k or more.
>>>
>>> As for the K3 replacement, it’s quite possible that Ricoh has decided that
>>> high end APS-C is now a dead end and will continue with lower end bodies,
>>> or perhaps go mirrorless with that format while concentrating their
>>> flagship efforts on the 35mm format.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> On 16 February 2018 at 11:13, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Uh...yes. I have the lenses and camera (k-1) I need. Want the 70-250
>>>> but waiting for a price break. The K-1 II is a typical between models
>>>> upgrade, much like we saw between the K5 and K3. The next full frame camera
>>>> will probably be a Nikon 850 clone, and Ill buy it. No problem here,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 15, 2018, at 6:39 PM, Zos Xavius <zosxav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most pointless update ever IMO. Are they taking a page from Canon now?
>>>> Wtf
>>>>>>> Ricoh? No k3 replacement in sight either. No new GR. A lens or two a
>>>> year
>>>>>>> now? Will there be any pentaxians left???
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
>>>> www.robertstech.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to