The Pentax KP had a high ISO of 819,200. Two steps below that would be
204,800; four steps is 51, 200. Two-four steps means usable high ISO
starts where the K3 maxes out and extends to where the K-1 maxes out.
How high is the k-1ii announced as going? Will it have the same range
as the KP?
Will the "upgraded" K-1 have the same max ISO as the K-1ii.
On 2/22/2018 14:25, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Joe, In my experience, with all digital cameras (DSLRs, P&S's, ...) -
the highest realistically (reliably) usable ISO is about 2-4 steps
below the maximum one. E.g. with the K5-IIs that has the highest
setting of 512,000, the highest I've been using is 6400, while trying
not to exceed 3200. Beyond that, you can see the images, but they are
too noisy to be usable. I may have pushed to 128,000 1-2 times, but
without any valuable outcomes.
So, raising the maximum ISO, raises the range of _usable_ ISOs. I am
sure that several people on this list would appreciate that. Right
And I agree with Bill: if I had a K-1, and was actively using its
high-ISO range (as I've been doing for several years previously, but
with less capable Pentax DSLRs), I'd considered that upgrade as a
very helpful (and money-saving) option.
jtainter Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:08:37 -0800 wrote:
I doubt if I'll ever need ISO 819,200 and I will probably never use
pixel shift. Is there any other reason to take up this offer?
Also, if I get this new motherboard, will I have to do focus
testing again on all of my (many) lenses? Unless the upgrade offers
something more than the above, this would be a deal killer.
Thanks to anyone who can answer.
Bill Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:21:06 -0800 wrote:
Beats the heck out of using the latest and greatest for nearly two
years (the K1 is closer to two years old than one), and then
getting to pay another $2K to "upgrade" to the latest and
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow