It was tough light,. There were greenish lights on the house behind me, I don't know if they were fluorescent or some sort of vapor lights. On the other side of the bridge was a barn with very bright, maybe led lights. In retrospect I should have shot at a lower iso and not blown out the highlights. I expect that I'll have more chances to get it right. I've got to head back up in a few weeks, I'm going to have a show in a restaurant up in Depoe Bay starting mid June. Damn, full moon so no chance of getting good sky.
On May 27, 2019 5:14:49 PM PDT, "Dale H. Cook" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 5/27/2019 6:48 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > >> My favorite is 106, but the green on the far bank on the left seems >> unnaturally intense. I'll try toning it down a bit when I get a chance. That was being lot by the bizarre green light behind me. I was working so hard on the trees and sky I missed the ground. > >I was thinking the same thing, but it is very interesting to see what >avenues Larry is exploring in post. I generally prefer to spend a lot >of >time trying to improve my in-camera images, as I would rather fiddle >with glass, filters, et. al., than fiddle with post. I spend so much >time on the computer for other reasons that I am loathe to increase my >time in front of the alphabet synthesizer. Does anyone recognize what >phrase from an all-time classic mystery series I hijacked to create >"alphabet synthesizer"? My primary concern is the final image, unfortunately sometimes it takes a lot of work in pay to make it look like I got it right in the camera. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
