Hi Mishka, On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:04:54 -0700 (PDT), Mishka wrote:
>this is what i was talking about (comments are welcome) >http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/ignatievmatterccbrandeisedu/vwp?.dir=/Boston+2002&.src=bc&.dnm=22.jpg >http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/ignatievmatterccbrandeisedu/vwp?.dir=/Boston+2002&.src=bc&.dnm=22---1.jpg You are right, this does look weird. But that is mainly because the perspective correction was overdone, it is MUCH better to correct for only 95% of the distortion than do it 105% ... If you look at the second image, you will see that the columns of the gate seem to widen towards the top. I also have the impression that the whole image should be rotated counter-clockwise about 1 degree ... When done correctly, you will NOT see a real difference between a photoshop correction, and a correction using a shifted lens. (apart from loss of image-quality maybe if using a too low resoluation) Regards, Jan van Wijk ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
