You may be right, but still that's not my opinion. There will still be requirements for rather large prints, and the loss of resolution experienced for serious correction of an 11x14 or larger from 35mm negative using even the best scanners is not acceptable to me. Better to have evenly spaced random grain across the print.
Just my opinion. FYI, and slightly off this specific topic, some of these lenses (not Pentax) are shift/tilt lenses. No amount of manipulation in Photoshop will bring back the (apparent) depth of field control that tilt affords. Regards, Bob... From: "Cameron Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Not if you have Photoshop. All of the camera movement corrections can be > done in an instant with the photoshop layer commands such as distort, > perspective, etc. IMHO, shift lenses are a thing of the past, unless you > really have to use the straight chromes (i.e. projecting). - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
