Exactly!!! But, at least from the technical pov, they are not. If you check the verticals, they are, well, vertical :) What's more interesting, I found that even if I do the correction 95%, rather than 100%, as it was suggested here, it still looks overdone. And that was my original point. It doesn't work the way (I) want it to. I think it has to do with the way human eyes work: from a given viewpoint one expects a definite amount of distortion, and when it'snot there, it starts looking... well, weird.
For minor corrections, it does work wonders though. Mishka > From: John Coyle > Subject: RE: 28mm/3.5 shift lens: worth getting? > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:59:24 -0700 > -------- > > Interesting - looking at both Fred and Mishka's corrected images on > my screen, they seem over-corrected! Does anyone else get this effect? > > > John Coyle > Brisbane, Australia Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
