On 29 Jul 2002 at 21:47, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:

> That was my impression when using the FG grip. There was a greater torque
> reaction when the lens was being focused. particularly with lithium AA's in the
> grip. This did, however, stop after a few months: the AF motor died. Lesson
> learned: If you want long lived, fast AF get a body with a big AF motor that
> takes "real" batteries.

I'm not disputing that you had a problem with your MZ-S and I appreciate that 
the MZ-S might not have the fastest AF on the globe but I'm sure that the AF 
motor wouldn't be under-powered. I tested the torque required to manually focus 
all my lenses via the coupling on the mount, most are quite loose and require 
very little torque, I assume that the AF motor is pretty highly geared too. So 
unless the lens focus ring is being prevented from turning during AF then I 
can't see why there would be a problem and then I'd assume that the system 
would employ some sort of safety clutch?

The AA lithium cells have quite low internal resistance and can deliver a 
higher sustained current than can the internal batteries so the fact that AF 
works faster when using the grip pack is feasible.

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to