Seems the only logical choice you've ever made is choosing Pentax ;).
At 04:58 PM 9/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I started with a used Kodak rangefinder in the early 60's, moved up to a
>Nikkormat in 65 or 66. Switched to an OM-1 for the size and more reliable
>light meter. Switched to an ME-Super for the size and a more reliable light
>meter. Have stuck with Pentax for the last 20 years or so because of
>reliability, quality design, backward computability of lenses, and because I
>prefer Subarus over Explorers, Macs over Windoze machines, fountain pens
>over ball points, intuition over structured processes, and a harsh cabernet
>over a mellow merlot. So call me an odd ball.
>
>Stan
>
> > From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:23:49 -0400
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Orgin Myths
> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:25:42 -0400
> >
> > this thread is so depressing... seems like the only reason everyone is
> using
> > pentax gear is because that's what they used when they were kids.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 4:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: Orgin Myths
> > ....
> >
> >> Now that I have so many accessories and what not, I
> >> can't leave Pentax, which I want to due but cannot financially. Reason?
> >> Here in London it's impossible to get anything I want without waiting a
> >> month. I see the stock of the stores and there is a tiny pile for Pentax,
> >> slightly larger one for Minolta, and two HUGE piles of Nikon and Canon.
> > ....
> >
> > brad, if you already have that many "accessories and what not", why do you
> > care how many piles are in stores? is there something specific that you
> need
> > and cannot get for your pentax gear?
> >
> > best,
> > mishka
> >
> >
> >
