On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I wonder. If "LX with AF" is taken to mean AF camera with LX interface, that > would be the ZX-5n, which indeed was made (and successful); if it's supposed to > mean AF camera with LX build quality, isn't the MZ-S supposed to fit that > description?
Except for the fact that I don't think teh finder on the ZX-5n is nearly as good as what I expect the LX has to offer, to say nothing of the -6EV metering or teh fact that its OTF. I'd hate to see the ZX-5n dropped, it makes sense to have a body like it in the lineup, its truly unique among the SLRs made today. -- http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye. http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
