Consensus is that Canon has now overtaken Epson in the quality stakes, but the comparable models are double the price and the ink is more expensive too!
HP are way behind in quality, but generally ahead in terms of speed. Lexmark are a good budget buy, but be aware you are getting budget quality - possibly above HP though. > -----Original Message----- > From: Herb Chong [mailto:HerbChong@;compuserve.com] > Sent: 12 November 2002 16:19 > To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Christmas cards > > > Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I guess both camps have their pro's and con's. I think I > will go with > >the > Epson! > > Mike.< > > i observed before that at the PhotoPlus Expo in NYC a week > ago, anyone who was doing digital output and wasn't a printer > vendor was using an Epson. right now, they are the benchmark > in quality of photo reproduction. Canon and HP are trying to > catch up, but i couldn't tell from what they had at the Expo > whether they were close or not. > > Herb.... > >
