Now this is more like it. Someone with actual experience. My opinion may differ from yours, but at least you have made your own opinion. What may affect my view is that I scan at 4000dpi - this makes you VERY aware of any differences. Also, how big are your prints? There is a world of difference between comparing 6*4 prints and comparing slides projected to 4 foot wide.
> -----Original Message----- > From: tom [mailto:thomas@;bigdayphoto.com] > > I own both and think you're wrong. I can't tell the prints > apart. Maybe a test with an optical target would show the > 24/2 to be slightly better at f4 or 5.6, but I certainly > wouldn't say it's in another league. > > The 20-35/4 is amazingly sharp, and has excellent color and contrast. > > The 24/2 is obviously better suited for low-light work, which > is where I use it. If I've got some light, I use the 20-35. > > tv > > > >
