> -----Original Message----- > From: tom [mailto:thomas@;bigdayphoto.com] > > I agree. It also depends on how you shoot. Most of my shots > are handheld available light sort of stuff - technique and > film play a much more important role than resolution in these > cases. If I'm using a tripod, I'm using the 645.
Ah, just about everything I use wides for is on a tripod or monopod - usually the former. > Having said that, I've made a lot of 11x14's from each lens > shot wide open that I've printed myself. The only difference > that I can see is that the the light is lower when I'm > shooting the f/2. So are you saying the 24 at f/2 is as good as the 20-35 at f/4? > I get great results from both lenses. I don't doubt it, they are both fabulous. > On another note, someone said the 24/2 is big and heavy. I > guess compared to a pancake lens it is, but it seems pretty > light and compact compared to most of my other lenses. I agree there. I see it as light compared to everything else I own.
