> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Brigham [mailto:Robert.Brigham@;badger.co.uk]
>
>
>
> > Having said that, I've made a lot of 11x14's from each lens
> > shot wide open that I've printed myself. The only difference
> > that I can see is that the the light is lower when I'm
> > shooting the f/2.
>
> So are you saying the 24 at f/2 is as good as the 20-35 at f/4?

It's kind of apples to oranges due to DOF and the sort of light you
have at f/2 vs. f/4, but yes, more or less.

tv


Reply via email to