-----Original Message----- > From: Rob Brigham [mailto:Robert.Brigham@;badger.co.uk] > > > Now this is more like it. Someone with actual experience. > My opinion > may differ from yours, but at least you have made your own opinion. > What may affect my view is that I scan at 4000dpi - this > makes you VERY > aware of any differences. Also, how big are your prints? > There is a > world of difference between comparing 6*4 prints and > comparing slides > projected to 4 foot wide.
I agree. It also depends on how you shoot. Most of my shots are handheld available light sort of stuff - technique and film play a much more important role than resolution in these cases. If I'm using a tripod, I'm using the 645. Having said that, I've made a lot of 11x14's from each lens shot wide open that I've printed myself. The only difference that I can see is that the the light is lower when I'm shooting the f/2. I get great results from both lenses. On another note, someone said the 24/2 is big and heavy. I guess compared to a pancake lens it is, but it seems pretty light and compact compared to most of my other lenses. tv
