I have been running either Win2k pro or XP Pro for the past 2 years. Once you turn off the silly new interface of XP, the graphics load on the machine is not any different than Win2k. The biggest reason to move up to XP Pro for me had to do with VPN issues with work. Also, Mr. Gates won't easily sell you Win2k anymore. Bill, your machine is not much different than mine. I would strongly recommend the move to XP Pro. Far more stable than Win9xxx.
Bruce Tuesday, November 26, 2002, 10:18:26 PM, you wrote: MVLS> I would go with 2000 - stable and I don't see the need for XP MVLS> Maris MVLS> ----- Original Message ----- MVLS> From: "Bob Rapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MVLS> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MVLS> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:06 PM MVLS> Subject: Re: Stupid Windows question >> 2000 and XP do a much better job of managing memory than 98 and would >> proably be quicker in photoshop. >> >> Bob >> > >> > i wouldn't with that CPU. will still be pretty slow in Photoshop. >> > >> > Herb.... >> > >> > >>
