On 8/30/06, Phil Tomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/30/06, Lennon Day-Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ActiveMQ is
> heavyweight, "enterprise grade" middleware, which sounds like it may
> be overkill for your situation.
>
Yes, that's the impression I get. ActiveMQ runs on servers and
probably shouldn't be run on a little portable box with limited
resources... but it wasn't my idea.
In terms of java apps, ActiveMQ can actually be run in a very
lightweight configuration. But it's still a java app and will have
certain overhead -- even when run as a binary through gcj, I believe.
_______________________________________________
PDXRuby mailing list
[email protected]
IRC: #pdx.rb on irc.freenode.net
http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby
