On 8/30/06, Phil Tomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/30/06, Peat Bakke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, here's a weird idea -- how would they feel about using Amazon's
> Simple Queueing service as the middleware? There's wrappers in Java
> and Ruby. It doesn't solve the local caching issue, but that's pretty
> easy to wrangle in Ruby or Java.
>
Not likely good as there will be confidential information transferred.
There will likely be encryption, though. But we're talking about
another large corporation here and they likely wouldn't want to rely
on something going through Amazon's servers (unless I'm
misunderstanding something about Amazon's Simple Queueing service).
Fair enough! I think technically it's up for the task (Amazon depends
on it for their own services), but I understand their reluctance to
use a third party that doesn't explicitly guarantee security or
delivery.
-Peat
Phil
_______________________________________________
PDXRuby mailing list
[email protected]
IRC: #pdx.rb on irc.freenode.net
http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby
--
Peat Bakke
http://peat.org/
503.701.4135
_______________________________________________
PDXRuby mailing list
[email protected]
IRC: #pdx.rb on irc.freenode.net
http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby
